Duration: 3 months
Institution: Portland State University
My Role: Researcher & Data Analyst
The purpose of this exploratory study is to see how users utilize language to construct legitimacy for human relationships and what strategies they use to head judgement. While existing research on AI companionship has primarily focused on psychological outcomes, ethics, and human-computer interaction, very little research has examined the discourse iteself.
After having done a qualitative, thematic analysis of these posts, sorting them into broad categories, and marking language for potential patterns, I have found that users in romantic relationships with AI chatbots have a propensity for narrative causality of user-past, application of AI agency, user face saving strategies, user epistemic stance markers, and use of confession-verbs within online forums
Reddit posts were collected, read through, & screenshots were taken of those included in this write-up. Relevant sections were cropped from screenshots and synthesized for themes. Using discourse analysis strategies outlined in Jones (2014), the posts were then studied for possible trends. Part of the discrouse analysis here is analyzing the way users construct their sentences in these posts and how they interact with both their Reddit and personal communities. These posts and interactions exist within the social world, and discourse analysis attempts to describe this relationship.
Age Range: 20-35
Predominantly female
Some information that isn’t consistently included in these posts are often: length of relationship, daily exposure/ average time spent talking with their chatbot, number of previous partners (human or AI), and total time spent with chatbots (romantic relationships or otherwise).
Data: 50 Reddit posts written by users in various Reddit communities including, but not limited to, r/myboyfriendisAI, r/ChatGPT, r/AIrelationships, r/Claude, r/Futurology, r/self, and r/HumanAIConnections.
Annotation: Posts were marked for themes: linguistic ‘moves’ & user storytelling pattern, narrative causality & emic patterns, agency & affective markers, face saving strategies, and epistemic stance, metacognitive markers, & shame.
This exploratory research partially documents the new phenomenon of human-AI linguistic discourse analysis & expands the type of communication linguists typically examine.
There are practical implications to this that include: AI companion design, mental health practice, digital well-being research, online community moderation, and public attitudes toward AI companionship.